What He Said
Its almost like he was watching races in Minnesota the lat few cycles. Worth the read!
Richard Mourdock – Why He Lost
I want to start by thanking Richard Mourdock for his courage. Not only did he choose to run for office, but he chose to take on an Indiana institution, Dick Lugar, in the primary. I was a vocal supporter of Mourdock early on because I believed his heart was in the right place and that he wanted to go to work for Hoosiers. On the issues there was no questioning his conservative credentials. I believed he would be a great Senator for Indiana. What I didn’t anticipate was an inexperienced campaign staff, party division, and a divisive comment that would sink his campaign.
It doesn’t matter how much you agree with the candidate if the candidate can’t win. You have to be able to win, that doesn’t mean you change what he says or believes, but you have to understand that winning isn’t just a message.










Read AAplikowski’s What He Said – Relates to MN races, too! http://t.co/t1yY3rzA
I disagree. You don’t have to compromise what you believe to win elections, but there is the right way and the wrong way to say things. In addition, you have to be clear, consistent, and conservative where it counts– fiscally. THEN you have to do all the campaign mechanics right. Tough, especially in a 3-against-1 system, with ABM, MSM and DFL against you.
This was about a specific candidate who didn’t face any onslaught or Dayton attack dogs. He ran a terrible campaign which looked almost exactly like the one in the story.
As to it being an impossible year, then why did CD6 dominate the DFL here?